Bevielių technologijų poveikio gyviems organizmams ir aplinkai moksliniai tyrimai


GSM 3G technologija naudoja nejonizuojančią radiaciją, kuri oficialiai nėra kenksminga. Bet atlikus detalesnį tyrimą paaiškėjo, kad tai netiesa. Tyrimas jo metodai ir rezultatai yra mokslininkų patvirtinti kaip teisingi - “Priešingai nei kritika, ekspertų ekspertų grupė neseniai padarė išvadą, kad NTP tyrimai buvo gerai parengti ir kad rezultatai parodė, kad tiek GSM, tiek CDMA moduliuoti RFR yra kancerogeniniai širdies (schwannomos) ir smegenų (gliomos). patinų patinai.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30243215
Dar vis tikite, kad 4G ir 5G yra saugios technologijos, nors nėra atlikta pakankamai išsamių ir nepriklausomų tyrimų?

(Replace this first paragraph with a brief description of your new category. This guidance will appear in the category selection area, so try to keep it below 200 characters.)

Use the following paragraphs for a longer description, or to establish category guidelines or rules:

  • Why should people use this category? What is it for?

  • How exactly is this different than the other categories we already have?

  • What should topics in this category generally contain?

  • Do we need this category? Can we merge with another category, or subcategory?

Daug informacijos lietuviškai ir vienoje vietoje http://www.esmogas.lt/

“We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe” - Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/

more than 500 studies 181022_EMF Studies from Powerwatch.pdf (997.2 KB)

15min - Lietuvoje jau padidintos leistinos elektromagnetinės spinduliuotės normos

Sveikatos apsaugos viceministro Algirdo Šešelgio teigimu, Lietuvoje iki šiol galiojusioje higienos normoje elektromagnetinio lauko intensyvumo parametrų vertės gyvenamojoje aplinkoje buvo iki 10 kartų žemesnės, nei rekomenduojamos Europos Tarybos (ET), Pasaulio sveikatos organizacijos (PSO), Tarptautinės apsaugos nuo nejonizuojančiosios spinduliuotės komisijos (ICNIRP) bei Europos Komisijos Atsirandančių ir nustatomų naujų pavojų sveikatai mokslinio komiteto (SCENIHR).

SCENIHR :roll_eyes: Tokios organizacijos nuo 2015 metų nebėra. Kuo rėmėsi SAM?
FORMER SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEES
SCENIHR - Does electromagnetic field exposure endanger health? March, 2015
Electromagnetic Fields, SCENIHR (2007)
Electromagnetic Fields 2009 Update

SCHEER - Statement on emerging health and environmental issues (2018)

4.4 Potential effects on wildlife of increases in electromagnetic radiation
References

  1. Nebeveikianti nuoroda į Naujosios Zelandijos dokumentą
  2. Aertsa S., Wiart J., Martens L., Joseph W. (2017). atliktų EMF matavimų tyrimas Prie ko čia?
  3. Pall M.L. (2018). Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health Labai rimtas tyrimas apie Wi-Fi pavojų žmonėms, bet prie ko čia laukiniai gyvūnai? Wi-Fi dažniausiai naudojamas patalpose.
  4. Di Ciaula A. (2018).
    Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications?

Further studies are needed to better and independently explore the health effects of RF-EMF in general and of MMW in particular. However, available findings seem sufficient to demonstrate the existence of biomedical effects, to invoke the precautionary principle, to define exposed subjects as potentially vulnerable and to revise existing limits. An adequate knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms linking RF-EMF exposure to health risk should also be useful in the current clinical practice, in particular in consideration of evidences pointing to extrinsic factors as heavy contributors to cancer risk and to the progressive epidemiological growth of noncommunicable diseases..
Bet vėl, nieko apie laukinę gamtą.

  1. Russell C.L. (2018). 5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications

Precaution in the roll out of this new
technology is strongly indicated.

  1. Conclusion
    Although 5G technology may have many unimagined uses and
    benefits, it is also increasingly clear that significant negative con-
    sequences to human health and ecosystems could occur if it is widely
    adopted. Current radiofrequncy radiation wavelengths we are exposed
    to appear to act as a toxin to biological systems. A moratorium on the
    deployment of 5G is warranted, along with development of in-
    dependent health and environmental advisory boards that include in-
    dependent scientists who research biological effects and exposure levels
    of radiofrequency radiation.
    Sound regulatory policy regarding current
    and future telecommunications initiative will require more careful as-
    sessment of risks to human health, environmental health, public safety,
    privacy, security and social consequences. Public health regulations
    need to be updated to match appropriate independent science with the
    adoption of biologically based exposure standards prior to further de-
    ployment of 4G or 5G technology.

    Considering the current science, lack of relevant exposure standards
    based on known biological effects and data gaps in research, we need to
    reduce our exposure to RF EMR where ever technically feasible.
    Laws or
    policies which restrict the full integrity of science and the scientific
    community with regards to health and environmental effects of wireless
    technologies or other toxic exposures should be changed to enable
    unbiased, objective and precautionary science to drive necessary public
    policies and regulation. Climate change, fracking, toxic emissions and
    microwave radiation from wireless devices all have something in
    common with smoking. There is much denial and confusion about
    health and environmental risks, along with industry insistence for ab-
    solute proof before regulatory action occurs
    (Frentzel-Beyme, 1994;
    MichaelsMichaels, 2008). There are many lessons we have not learned
    with the introduction of novel substances, which later became pre-
    carious environmental pollutants by not heeding warning signs from
    scientists (Gee, 2009). The threats of these common pollutants continue
    to weigh heavily on the health and wellbeing of our nation. We now
    accept them as the price of progress. If we do not take precautions but
    wait for unquestioned proof of harm will it be too late at that point for
    some or all of us?

Na štai ir atsirado trūkstama puzlės detalė. Dabar jau oficialiai galima vadinti WHO, ICNIRP, SCHEER sąmokslu. O Lietuvos SAM (ypač sveikatos apsaugos viceministrą Algirdą Šešelgį), Universitetus, bei Facebook faktų tikrintojus (15min ir Delfi) bendrasąmokslininkais. Vienas dalykas yra teigti, kad šimtai eksperimentų su gyvūnais, įrodančių mikrobangų pavojų gyviems organizmams, neigimas, teigiant kad tai nebūtinai tinka žmonėms. Kitas dalykas nuo 2012 išslaptintas CŽV dokumentas, kuriame yra tą patį patvirtinantys eksperimentai su žmonėmis. Jeigu tai nėra sąmoningas informacijos slėpimas nuo visuomenės, tai tikrai yra nusikalstamas aplaidumas.
TRANSLATIONS ON USSR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES (GUO 28/77) EFFECTS OF NONIONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
EFFECTS OF NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION